Exploring Interactive Read Aloud Literacy Learning and Quality Books in the Merdeka Curriculum
Eksplorasi Pembelajaran Literasi Membaca Nyaring Interaktif dan Buku Berkualitas dalam Kurikulum Merdeka
Abstract
The Indonesian government issued a policy on teacher literacy teaching competency standards, which includes teachers' ability to help students access, use, interpret and communicate information and ideas through various texts according to students' characteristics and needs (Ministry of Education, 2022a). This study aims to promote reading aloud and interactive book selection in literacy learning for public primary school teachers in Depok, West Java, Indonesia. This qualitative case study explored teachers' understandings and practices in selecting books and integrating reading aloud activities with learning outcomes in Merdeka Curriculum. Six teachers participated in the study, which involved data collection through surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), interviews, observations and oral reflections. Using manual thematic data analysis, this study focused on teachers' practices of selecting leveled books and integrating discussions in reading aloud with Learning Outcomes. The results showed that teachers began to express their understanding of book selection. Major themes that emerged included the importance of selecting quality books and the challenges of selecting quality books. In the context of literacy learning, several themes also emerged that became teachers' reflections in conducting interactive read aloud activities in accordance with the learning outcomes, namely; benefits, awareness for better classroom preparation, interactive discussion spaces and continuous training.
References
Acosta-Tello, E. (2019). Reading Aloud: Engaging Young Children during a Read Aloud Experience. Research in Higher Education Journal, 37.
Adhari, F. N., Hanipah, R., Rustini, T., & Arifin, M. H. (2022). Pengaruh penggunaan gawai terhadap minat literasi baca pada pembelajaran ips di sekolah dasar. Mahaguru: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33487/mgr.v3i1.3232
Anisa, A. R., Ipungkarti, A. A., & Saffanah, K. N. (2021). Pengaruh kurangnya literasi serta kemampuan dalam berpikir kritis yang masih rendah dalam pendidikan di Indonesia. In Current Research in Education: Conference Series Journal (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-12).
Auster, E. R., & Wylie, K. K. (2006). Creating active learning in the classroom: A systematic approach. Journal of management education, 30(2), 333-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905283346
Boche, B. (2023). Integrated Interactive Read Aloud.
Boyd, M. P., & Devennie, M. K. (2009). Student voices and teacher choices: Selecting chapter book read-alouds. Childhood Education, 85(3), 148-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2009.10521380
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Calkins, L. (2015). A Guide to the Reading Workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cervetti, G., & Hiebert, E. H. (2015). Knowledge, literacy, and the common core. Language Arts, 92(4), 256-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/la201526914
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, Evaluating, Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson.
Dafit, F., & Ramadan, Z. H. (2020). Pelaksanaan program gerakan literasi sekolah (gls) di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1429-1437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.585
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Drake, Susan M and Savage, Michael J. 2016. Negotiating Accountability and Integrated Curriculum from a Global Perspective. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 127-144
Dewayani, S.,Isaeni, N.,Meliyanti., Mayangwuri, S.,Panjaitan, F.J.,Nurlaila.R.,(2022). “Seri penguatan literasi dalam pembelajaran di SD dan SMP: Panduan penggunaan modul. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi.
Durriyah, T. L. (2021). “Applying a Book Read Aloud and Leveraging It with Storyline Online: A Case Study of Indonesian Preservice Teachers.” The International Academic Forum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.15
Fisher, D., Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Frey, N. (2004). Interactive read-alouds: Is there a common set of implementation practices? The Reading Teacher, 58(1), 8–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.1.1
Flores, T. T., Vlach, S. K., & Lammert, C. (2019). The role of children’s literature in cultivating preservice teachers as transformative intellectuals: A literature review. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 214-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19839181
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Reserach Competencies for Analysis and Application. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Hemerick, K. A. (1999). The effects of reading aloud in motivating and enhancing students' desire to read independently.
Indonesian Ministry of Education (2021). Panduan Penguatan Literasi dan Numerasi di Sekolah. Jakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved from repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/22599/1/ Panduan_Penguatan_Literasi_dan_Numerasi_di_Sekolah_bf1426239f.pdf
Khalifatussalam, R. I. (2021). Low Literacy in Indonesia: understanding and factors that influence it. low literacy in indonesia: Understanding and Factors That Influence It, November, 1-8.
Lennox, S. (2013). Interactive read-alouds—An avenue for enhancing children’s language for thinking and understanding: A review of recent research. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 381-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0578-5
Malloy, J. A., Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2014). Assessing motivation to read: The Motivation to read profile-revised. The Reading Teacher, 67(4), 273-282). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1215
Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Boston: Pearson.
Muspratomo, C. (2023, May 14). Jika guru saja malas membaca, bagaimana nasib literasi kita?. Kumparan. https://kumparan.com/cindy-muspratomo/jika-guru-saja-malas-membaca-bagaimana-nasib-literasi-kita-20OqHriVumc
Palincsar, A. S., & Duke, N. K. (2004). The role of text and text-reader interactions in young children’s reading development and achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 105(2), 183-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/428864
Peraturan dirjen guru dan tenaga kependidikan nomor 0340 tahun 2022 tentang kerangka kompetensi literasi dan numerasi guru sd.
Saadati, B. A., & Sadli, M. (2019). Analisis pengembangan budaya literasi dalam meningkatkan minat membaca peserta didik di sekolah dasar. Terampil: Jurnal pendidikan dan pembelajaran Dasar, 6(2), 151-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v6i2.4829
Safford, K. (2014). A reading for pleasure pedagogy. In Building Communities of Engaged Readers (pp. 89-107). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772585-7
Setyawan, D., & Gusdian, R. I. (2020). Penguatan habitus literasi: sebuah cara pendampingan tim literasi sekolah (TLS). E-DIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 11(3), 299-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/e-dimas.v11i3.4263
Schmitt, M. C., & Gregory, A. E. (2005). The impact of an early literacy intervention: where are the children now?. Literacy teaching and learning, 10(1), 1-20.
Shedd, M. K., & Duke, N. K. (2008). The power of planning: Developing effective read-alouds. Young Children, 63(6), 22-27.
Strachan, S. L. (2015). Kindergarten students’ social studies and content literacy learning from interactive read-alouds. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(4), 207-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.08.003
Stone, C., & Conrad, D. (2017). Preparing today to empower future students: preservice teachers' experiences selecting & evaluating children's literature for quality and use in prek-6th grade integrated literacy/science instruction. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 27(1), 3.
Thomas, D. R. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis.
Turiman, Punia, et all. 2012. Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Elsevier, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 59, 110 – 116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2012). Analyzing differentiation in the classroom: Using the COS-R. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 42-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217511427431
Widjati, T. & Dinata, H. K. (2019). Malam tahun baru Kibo. Bandung: Litara Publisher.
Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of educational research, 79(2), 702-739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330970
Copyright (c) 2024 Tati Lathipatud Durriyah, Catur Niasari, Iin Afriyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.