Developing Instructional Media Android-Based for Building Computational Thinking Skills for High School Students Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Android untuk Membangun Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasional Siswa SMA

Article Sidebar

Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
PDF
Published: Mar 7, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v13i1.1610
Keywords:
Computational Thinking, Informatic Subject, Media Android-Based

Main Article Content

Diana Murniatiningtyas
Universitas PGRI Adi Buana
I Nyoman Sudana Degeng
Universitas Negeri Malang
Nurmida Catherine Sitompul
Universitas PGRI Adi Buana

Abstract

This research aims to develop android-based instructional media to build computational thinking skill for High School students using the ADDIE Model.   Computational thinking is studied in informatics subjects. The development product has gained an expert feasibility assessment and tested on students.  The research instruments are questionnaires and test. Experts include content experts, instructional media experts, and instructional design experts.  Trials to students consist of one-on-one evaluation, small group evaluation and tryout or classroom. The results of the assessment of experts show that the product is very feasible to use as instructional media. Small group evaluation and tryout at classroom shown that the product is categorized as very feasible to be used as multimedia to develop computational thinking.  The effectiveness of product development is measured by pretest and posttest.  The effectiveness test results show a t-test value of -14.162 with a significance level of 0.000 (p value < 0.05), meaning that there is a difference in the average value of the pretest and posttest.  Thus, the use of C-Think as an instructional media is effectively to improve computational thinking skills of high school students. 


Highlights:



  • Development Process: Utilizing the ADDIE Model ensures systematic development of instructional media for effective learning outcomes.




  • Expert Evaluation: Expert feasibility assessment validates the quality and appropriateness of the developed instructional media.




  • Effectiveness Testing: Pretest-posttest analysis demonstrates significant improvement in computational thinking skills among high school students using the developed Android-based instructional media.



Keywords: Computational Thinking, Informatic Subject, Media Android-Based

Article Details

How to Cite
Murniatiningtyas, D., Degeng, I. N. S., & Sitompul, N. C. (2024). Developing Instructional Media Android-Based for Building Computational Thinking Skills for High School Students . Pedagogia : Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v13i1.1610
Issue
Vol 13 No 1 (2024): February
Section
Education Media and learning resources

Copyright (c) 2024 Diana Murniatiningtyas, I Nyoman Sudana Degeng, Nurmida Catherine Sitompul

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

1. Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 47–57.
2. Ariani, D. (2020). Gamifikasi untuk Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif, 3(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.032.09.
3. Augie, K. T., & Priatna, N. (2021). Penggunaan Podcast Untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa selama Gangguan Pandemi. Didactical Mathematics, 3(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v3i1.1042
4. Bebras, A. (2020). Bebras Australia Computational Thinking Round 2 Challenge 2020 Solutions Guide (hlm. 114). https://digitalcareers.csiro.au/en/Bebras/Bebras-resources/Bebras_365
5. Bower, M., Wood, L. N., Lai, J. W. M., Howe, C., & Lister, R. (2017). Improving the computational thinking pedagogical capabilities of school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4.
6. Caeli, E. N., & Bundsgaard, J. (2020). Computational thinking in compulsory education: A survey study on initiatives and conceptions. Education Tech Research Dev, 68, 551–573.
7. Dagienė, V., & Sentance, S. (2016). It’s Computational Thinking! Bebras Tasks in the Curriculum. Dalam
8. A.Brodnik & F. Tort (Ed.), Informatics in Schools: Improvement of Informatics Knowledge and Perception. ISSEP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(pp.28-39 (Vol. 9973). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46747-4_3
9. Efrialda, P. P., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2022). Pengembangan E-Modul Sistem Pertahanan Tubuh Dengan Instagram Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v13i1p41-51
10. Indonesia, T. O. K. (2016). Bebras Indonesia Challange 2016 Kelompok Penegak. http://bebras.or.id/v3/pembahasan-soal/
11. Indonesia, T. O. K. (2017). Tantangan Berbas Indonesia 2017 Tingkat SMA Bahan Belajar Computational Thinking. http://bebras.or.id/v3/pembahasan-soal/
12. Kadarwati, S., Suparman, & K, A. (2020). Keefektifan Computational Thingking (CT) dan Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Terhadap Penyelesaian Soal-Soal Cerita Materi Perbandingan (Skala Pada Peta) Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 63–68.
13. Kawuri, K. R., Budiharti, R., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Penerapan Computational Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas X MIA 9 SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta pada Materi Usaha dan Energi 6. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF, 9(2), 116–121.
14. Lestari, A. C., Annizar, A., & M. (2020). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PISA Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi. Jurnal Kiprah, 8, 46–55.
15. Mawaddah, W., Ahied, M., Hadi, W. P., & Wulandari, A. Y. R. (2019). Uji Kelayakan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Powerpoint Disertai Permainan Jeopardy Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Natural Science Education Research, 2(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v2i2.6254.
16. Muflikha, A. M., Saregar, A., Pratiwi, E., Yuberti, Y., Syafrimen, S., & Anugrah, A. (2023). Android-based physics instructional media to develop students’ computational thinking skill: Literature study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2595(1)). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/issue/2595/
17. Nuraisa. (1998). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD.
18. Pohan, J. E., Atmazaki, & Agustina. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Pendekatan Kontekstual Pada Menulis Resensi Di Kelas IX Smp 7 Padang Bolak. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 1–11.
19. Reich, R. (1992). The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. Vintage Publisher.
20. Riyadi, D. K., Degeng, P. D. D., & Junining, E. (2019). Developing Instructional Game" Adventure of Word" to Improve Morphological Awareness on Vocational Higher Students. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(2), 153–162.
21. Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD.
22. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian kuantitatif (R & D., Ed.). Alfabeta.
23. Wing, J. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366, 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118