Developing Instructional Media Android-Based for Building Computational Thinking Skills for High School Students
Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Android untuk Membangun Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasional Siswa SMA
-
(1) Diana Murniatiningtyas Universitas PGRI Adi Buana
Indonesia
(2) I Nyoman Sudana Degeng Universitas Negeri Malang
Indonesia
(3) * Nurmida Catherine Sitompul
Universitas PGRI Adi Buana
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research aims to develop android-based instructional media to build computational thinking skill for High School students using the ADDIE Model. Computational thinking is studied in informatics subjects. The development product has gained an expert feasibility assessment and tested on students. The research instruments are questionnaires and test. Experts include content experts, instructional media experts, and instructional design experts. Trials to students consist of one-on-one evaluation, small group evaluation and tryout or classroom. The results of the assessment of experts show that the product is very feasible to use as instructional media. Small group evaluation and tryout at classroom shown that the product is categorized as very feasible to be used as multimedia to develop computational thinking. The effectiveness of product development is measured by pretest and posttest. The effectiveness test results show a t-test value of -14.162 with a significance level of 0.000 (p value < 0.05), meaning that there is a difference in the average value of the pretest and posttest. Thus, the use of C-Think as an instructional media is effectively to improve computational thinking skills of high school students.
Highlights:
-
Development Process: Utilizing the ADDIE Model ensures systematic development of instructional media for effective learning outcomes.
-
Expert Evaluation: Expert feasibility assessment validates the quality and appropriateness of the developed instructional media.
-
Effectiveness Testing: Pretest-posttest analysis demonstrates significant improvement in computational thinking skills among high school students using the developed Android-based instructional media.
Keywords: Computational Thinking, Informatic Subject, Media Android-Based
References
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 47–57.
Ariani, D. (2020). Gamifikasi untuk Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif, 3(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.032.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/JPI.032.09
Augie, K. T., & Priatna, N. (2021). Penggunaan Podcast Untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa selama Gangguan Pandemi. Didactical Mathematics, 3(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v3i1.1042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v3i1.1042
Bebras, A. (2020). Bebras Australia Computational Thinking Round 2 Challenge 2020 Solutions Guide (hlm. 114). https://digitalcareers.csiro.au/en/Bebras/Bebras-resources/Bebras_365
Bower, M., Wood, L. N., Lai, J. W. M., Howe, C., & Lister, R. (2017). Improving the computational thinking pedagogical capabilities of school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4
Caeli, E. N., & Bundsgaard, J. (2020). Computational thinking in compulsory education: A survey study on initiatives and conceptions. Education Tech Research Dev, 68, 551–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09694-z
Dagienė, V., & Sentance, S. (2016). It’s Computational Thinking! Bebras Tasks in the Curriculum. Dalam DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46747-4_3
A.Brodnik & F. Tort (Ed.), Informatics in Schools: Improvement of Informatics Knowledge and Perception. ISSEP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(pp.28-39 (Vol. 9973). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46747-4_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46747-4
Efrialda, P. P., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2022). Pengembangan E-Modul Sistem Pertahanan Tubuh Dengan Instagram Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v13i1p41-51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v13i1p41-51
Indonesia, T. O. K. (2016). Bebras Indonesia Challange 2016 Kelompok Penegak. http://bebras.or.id/v3/pembahasan-soal/
Indonesia, T. O. K. (2017). Tantangan Berbas Indonesia 2017 Tingkat SMA Bahan Belajar Computational Thinking. http://bebras.or.id/v3/pembahasan-soal/
Kadarwati, S., Suparman, & K, A. (2020). Keefektifan Computational Thingking (CT) dan Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Terhadap Penyelesaian Soal-Soal Cerita Materi Perbandingan (Skala Pada Peta) Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 63–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jkpm.7.1.2020.63-68
Kawuri, K. R., Budiharti, R., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Penerapan Computational Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas X MIA 9 SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta pada Materi Usaha dan Energi 6. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF, 9(2), 116–121.
Lestari, A. C., Annizar, A., & M. (2020). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PISA Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi. Jurnal Kiprah, 8, 46–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v8i1.2063
Mawaddah, W., Ahied, M., Hadi, W. P., & Wulandari, A. Y. R. (2019). Uji Kelayakan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Powerpoint Disertai Permainan Jeopardy Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Natural Science Education Research, 2(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v2i2.6254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v2i2.6254
Muflikha, A. M., Saregar, A., Pratiwi, E., Yuberti, Y., Syafrimen, S., & Anugrah, A. (2023). Android-based physics instructional media to develop students’ computational thinking skill: Literature study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2595(1)). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/issue/2595/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0123763
Nuraisa. (1998). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD.
Pohan, J. E., Atmazaki, & Agustina. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Pendekatan Kontekstual Pada Menulis Resensi Di Kelas IX Smp 7 Padang Bolak. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 1–11.
Reich, R. (1992). The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. Vintage Publisher.
Riyadi, D. K., Degeng, P. D. D., & Junining, E. (2019). Developing Instructional Game" Adventure of Word" to Improve Morphological Awareness on Vocational Higher Students. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(2), 153–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v4i22019p153
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian kuantitatif (R & D., Ed.). Alfabeta.
Wing, J. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366, 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
Copyright (c) 2024 Diana Murniatiningtyas, I Nyoman Sudana Degeng, Nurmida Catherine Sitompul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
